Now that you’ve prepared yourself and your nonprofit to choose your next consultant, you can begin your search!
This article was originally published in Bloomerang. Click here to read it.
You can read part one here.
By casting a big net in your search, you dramatically increase your chances of finding the best possible match. To get a deep and diverse talent pool, we recommend beginning by building a list of credible lead sources. Then, proceed to share the project outline and description through multiple channels:
Casting the net wide plus a little luck will get you a bigger pool of candidates than you can reasonably interview. If you really want the best possible match, then this is good news.
Consider your time and capacity as you set clear goals for the candidate search, selection, and interview process. Block enough time on your calendar to complete this process in weeks (not months). That way you can avoid a situation where your top candidates, who were excited and ready to go in July when they applied, are fully booked with other opportunities in November when you get back to them.
Get ready to use the evaluation matrix you created in article 1. The matrix is the tool you will use for candidate screening, evaluation, interview outcomes. Make sure you’ve clearly defined these things in advance:
Once the matrix has been filled in, you should have 3-5 clear front runners and you can schedule an interview with them.
Pro tip: Decide in advance what you will do if you have too many or too few qualified candidates for the interview stage. If too few, will you go back to the drawing board? Reclassify one or more “required” criteria as preferred? If too many, will you use cumulative score to narrow the field or do you have one or two preferred criteria? By deciding this in advance, you reduce the influence of unconscious bias.
Both you and the consultant will use the interview to figure out whether a strong match exists.
Remember to stick to the questions you developed in advance [insert link to article 1]. That will help minimize bias and to help you compare apples to apples. Avoid asking questions that have to do with your personal preferences; instead ask questions that support competence and capacity for the work (someone with an HR background can help you get this right and avoid questions that could even set you up for legal problems).
During the interview, speak frankly about your organization’s weaknesses and challenges. Why? Because nondisclosure increases the odds of a mismatch and/or poor project design and outcomes. If you have a three-alarm fire happening at your nonprofit, you want someone with the right skills and who can willingly take it on, eyes wide open, right? Remember that the consultant will figure out the truth eventually, but it will seriously undermine trust with you and your organization if you hid it and they found out the hard way. Frequently, by the time you’ve finished the interviews and completed the corresponding matrix, your choice will become clear. But if not, have a plan ready in advance for:
Pro tip: Bias has the most opportunity to appear during the interview. Things like physical appearance, accent, or details of a candidate’s personal history can cause us to reach unfair conclusions about them. That makes the preparation you do in advance to create an interview script, the evaluation matrix, and qualifying criteria that much more valuable. This is what makes sticking with these tools so important if you want to hire the best match for the job.
Before you sign a contract, be sure to check two or three references. As with the interview process, you’ll want to use a standardized script and matrix to reduce bias. When possible, seek out references from organizations that are similar to yours and for whom the consultant has done similar projects in the past.
In a handful of cases you may also want to conduct a criminal background check. For example, if the person will have access to HIPAA-protected data or your financial records. Remember with such checks that the existence of a criminal record should not automatically disqualify any candidate. Instead, carefully consider the nature of the crime and how recently it occurred. A twenty-year-old DWI conviction should not create concern for a potential bookkeeping candidate; a two-month-old DWI conviction should inform a decision to hire someone who would drive a vehicle on behalf of your organization.
When writing and negotiating the contract, your project will likely evolve as each party learns new things. Consider this an opportunity for fine tuning that will strengthen the project over the long-run because this ensures that you and the consultant have reached a shared understanding of the scope of work, timeline, budget, and deliverables.
We also recommend a proposal or contract review meeting as a standard part of the contract process. This will help to ensure that key contributors to the work are on board and well-informed. This kind of meeting, also called a kick-off meeting by some, can help both parties gain clarity and likely bring potential misunderstandings and omissions to the surface early (when it’s easier to address them).
Remember to send a brief “thank you for your interest” email to all candidates who applied once the final selection has been made. This is an important step, particularly for organizations in the social service sector. This courtesy helps boost your reputation with those candidates, makes them more likely to speak positively about you in the community, and increases the chances that they will apply for future opportunities.
Someone could write volumes about everything that could go right or wrong during the engagement. In the meantime, please keep these basic points in mind to encourage a positive experience for everyone: